Are you a Victim of Astride Starship LLC? You may Qualify for Financial Compensation! Apply below!
Meet the Owner Who Built a Business on Exploitation
Astride a Starship
14 years bullying the vulnerable
On her company’s own website, Astrid paints Astride A Starship LLC as a poetic “trip of equals” — safe, quiet refuges guided by “Good Orderly Direction” and “universal principles.” In reality, public records, reviews, and tenant accounts spanning 14 years tell a starkly different story. Behind the language of charm and compassion lies a business model built on extended move-out deadlines, “do not repair” directives, and deposit withholding practices that have cost vulnerable tenants millions.
And this isn’t a handful of bad experiences — it’s a pattern repeated across states, properties, and years. The marketing speaks of equality, safety, and calm; the reality shows systemic exploitation, legal violations, and a leadership style that has left countless tenants in financial and emotional distress. What she sells in words has never matched what she’s delivered in action.
If you’ve been exploited or affected by Astrid Starship or her company, your story matters. Each account strengthens the case and helps expose a pattern that’s already spanned more than a decade. Please share your experience in the form below — include dates, locations, and any supporting documents you have. Together, we can ensure these tactics are brought to light and held to account.
Allegations Against Astrid Starship LLC
A 14-Year Pattern of Exploiting Vulnerable Tenants
Over the past 14 years, Astrid Starship LLC has operated what appears to be a calculated, profit-driven scheme targeting lower-income individuals, elderly residents, and other vulnerable tenants across Colorado, Wyoming, and Hawaii.
According to financial analysis and tenant testimony, the company’s business model relies on:
Short-term leases designed to create high turnover and recycle security deposits.
Extended move-out deadlines (45 days) — a direct violation of Colorado law, which mandates a maximum of 30 days.
"Do Not Repair" policies before move-in, setting tenants up for unjust deposit deductions.
Disproportionate targeting of at-risk demographics, raising serious Fair Housing Act and ADA concerns.
Over the 14 years in question, this operational structure is estimated to have generated $47.53 million in unlawful gains, with potential legal exposure exceeding $142 million when applying treble damages provisions under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act.
This isn’t just a matter of bad business ethics — it’s a multi-state pattern of predatory practices that may qualify for RICO charges if proven systematic in court.